If youve ever wanted to go into the mind of a professional money manager and learn a bit about what makes them tick, I suggest you read The Single Best Investment.  If you want to learn more why dividend investing is considered a viable, long-term plan to build wealth, then read The Single Best Investment.

Lowell Miller, the author, is the President and lead portfolio manager of Miller/Howard Investments Inc. a firm that manages over $1 billion of other peoples money. Hes been a professional investor for more than 30 years.  In his spare time, Miller is a sculptor, a writer and holds a 5th degree black belt in Aikido, all pretty cool for a money guy.

After hearing about this book from various bloggers, DIY Investor I recall, I figured Id buy it and put it on my nightstand.  I finally got through this a few months ago.  It took some time, but it was worth it.

The title of the book, first of all, certainly intrigued me but the pages that followed were more than enough to keep me captivated. One of the things that made this book enjoyable to read was the writing style of Miller. He speaks plainly and openly with little technical jargon. There are no complex terms or theories to decipher. There are no graphs to be hoodwinked by. The graphs that are included are pretty much common knowledge: when inflation is factored in fixed-income investments always lose to equity investments, and holding cash does even worse. Instead labouring on these facts, Miller instead wrote a book for financial builders, people who want to understand how best to leverage the forces of time, modest, reliable and compounding growth to their advantage. Miller reminds his readers that investing is really, investing a methodical accumulation of capital through a sensible, disciplined plan that recognizes shares are not as he puts it little numbers that jump around in the paper every day. They represent a partnership in a real business.

Miller prescribes than any investor, can and should have a reasonable set of financial goals to work towards because they will always be plagued by financial doubts and uncertainties. Unlike many aspects of ones life, price and market changes cant be explained away. They just are. Therefore, because the market is always beyond our control and will frequently give us some emotional discomfort, you are wise to select a strategy that avoids playing the market but being an investor in it.  Buying and holding established companies that have a great history of rewarding investors in good times and in bad through consistent dividend payments, can be one such strategy Miller explains. Like a well-made old wool blanket, investing can be solid and comfortable, if you approach it sensibly.

Overall, I found The Single Best Investment an enjoyable read. It galvanized many dividend investing concepts and also highlighted a few new ones for me. The novice or experienced stock investor will enjoy this book. Each chapter is summed up quite nicely with key messages extracted from the chapters essays. Although the book has a distinct U.S. stock market bias, Canadian investors will benefit from Millers plain, blunt mantra – invest in the compounding machine that is dividend paying stocks and avoid story stocks or what the talking heads will praise.  Stick with what has worked (and rewarded investors) and dont look elsewhere Miller claims. Steady and dependable (dull and boring) will undoubtedly win the race.  

In the weeks to come, I hope to share my favourite takeaways and quotes from Millers book. Stay tuned for that post. 

What about you, have you read The Single Best Investment?  If so, what was your take?  If not, are you intrigued?

Cheers,
My Own Advisor

He believes that investors will be waiting a very long time for a traditional bull market. He recommends being a value investor and not being afraid of keeping some investment funds in cash. In order to protect yourself on the downside, he recommends buying stocks that are cheap, based on discounted cash flow. Chapter 12 is important as he covers an often overlooked subject, when to sell. Most important, he covers how to find new stock ideas.

If you are looking for a concise easy read on investing in sideways markets, get The Little Book of Sideways Markets: How to Make Money in Markets that Go Nowhere.

Incoming search terms:

• vitaliy katsenelson - the little book of sideways markets pdf

So here is what happened when I violated one of my rules. In December, I looked for low priced stocks that really tanked due to tax selling. I thought I found an interesting company called Constar International Inc. (CNST), a manufacturer of plastic containers. The stock traded as high as $20 a share back in April and had dropped below $2 a share in December. I thought that was a pretty good drop which I assumed was due to tax selling, possibly making it a great buy. So I looked further into the stock. The company had $1.42 in cash per share, and was trading way below the reported book value of $2.48 per share. But there was one little hitch; the company had debt, a lot of debt for its size. Its debt to equity ratio was stratospheric.

But I thought, I am just buying it for the very short term, the tax selling rebound, so the debt shouldn’t mean anything (first mistake). I bought a bunch around $2 a share on December 28. The first week of January, the stock traded between 1.80 and 2.00, and I kept waiting for it to pop (second mistake, if the trade doesn’t work in a reasonable number of days, get out). So on January 11, I checked my portfolio and noticed that it was down big time, even though the market was up at the time. I searched down my list of stocks and discovered that Constar had plunged by almost a buck from a previous close of 1.75 to 79 cents. That’s a drop of 55% in one day! I scrambled to find the cause of the drop and eventually discovered that the company had filed for bankruptcy.

So in exactly two weeks, I lost around 60% on that one stock, all because I violated my one primary rule, choose stocks with low or no debt. Yes, I’ll probably miss out on plenty of rising stocks with lots of debt, but I will have less downside risk, and less of a chance of getting downside shocks from bankruptcies.

The takeaway is, if you have a stock trading system that works, be disciplined and don’t waiver from your own rules. In my case, I had plenty of other stocks to choose from. As a matter of fact, WallStreetNewsNetwork.com has several lists of debt free stocks, including Debt Free Stocks Selling At Or Near Cash, High Cash No Debt High Yield Stocks, No Debt High Yield Stocks, No Debt Low Price To Cash Flow Stocks, and Stocks Selling Near Cash Per Share and Debt Free.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL.

By Stockerblog.com

Back in October last year, I announced the purchase of Aqua America (WTR:US), a water and wastewater services company that has over 3 million customers across 14 states.  At the time, I was pretty pleased with my purchase. Why?

o Aqua America provides what everyone needs; clean, safe, reliable water.
o Theyve been a dividend payer since 1939.
o Theyve paid quarterly dividends consecutively for more than 60 years.
o Their five year average dividend growth rate is over 8%.

With a market cap of about $3 billion they are not a small company and they have lots of room to grow through both acquisitions and service diversification.

So why did I sell them with mostly upside to be had?

Although I consider Aqua America a good company with long-term growth prospects, I recently found out that Aqua America is not eligible for any dividend reinvestment plan with my discount brokerage institution. This is in contrast to what Aqua America offers with their transfer agent Computershare in the U.S. Here are some highlights from their website:

o Aqua America, Inc. has a Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) that offers investors a convenient and economical way to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
o Computershare Shareholder Services, Incwill administer the Plan and act as Agent for the participants.
o As a shareholder, you can buy additional shares of our common stock at any time for as little as $50. You can pay by check or by a one-time online bank debit through the Buy Stock Direct option noted above, or have your payment automatically withdrawn from your U.S. bank account.

While DRIPping Aqua America through Computershare has its merits, I do not want to go through the hassle of setting up a U.S. bank account or always commit to a minimum $50 cheque to purchase more WTR:US shares. Unfortunately when I made my Aqua America purchase in October I assumed because they offered a full DRIP via their transfer agent they would offer a synthetic DRIP with my discount brokerage institution. This was not the case. This was alarmingly clear when dividends were paid to me in December in cash.  

My lesson learned?

Before I make another U.S. stock purchase, Ill check with my discount brokerage institution to ensure the stock is synthetically DRIP eligible. Not all U.S. companies who offer DRIPs with their transfer agents offer these plans synthetically with brokerages. Im not sure why WTR:US Board of Directors made this decision (maybe they want to keep more control over the companys shares?) but it was an annoying revelation for me.

Sure, I could have kept Aqua America shares and not had the dividends reinvested but I think that goes against my strategy as a dividend investor. For every stock I own, I want to have enough shares of any company to DRIP at least one full share every quarter. I can do that for almost every stock in my portfolio, except for a couple Canadian stocks. 

o My DRIPs will provide me with dollar-cost averaging.
o My DRIPs take the emotions out of my investing.
o My DRIPs will not cost me anything to buy more shares.
o My DRIPs will take advantage of the magic of compounding.
o My DRIPs help me set and forget part of my retirement plan.

 
What can I say? I made another investing mistake and Ill probably make more.  How about you? Any investing mistakes you care to share?

My Own Advisor

Tis the season for stock picking contests…

Mike from Money Smarts Blog is participating with a few other savvy DIY investors in a stock picking contest. You can read about that here.

HUZ Silver ETF
RIM Research in Motion
CVX Chevron
POT Potash

After visiting The Financial Blogger, I decided I would send in my selections for this year. He has encouraged folks to submit their 4 stock selections to compete against his and his peers offering a prize to the winner if you can beat our group of bloggers for the 2011 Best stock pick contest.
Here is what I picked:

Amongst other savvy DIY investors, click here to view Passive Income Earners selections.

Click here to see Beating The Index selections.

Click here to see Million Dollar Journey selections.

Again, go check out The Financial Blogger for your opportunity to speculate in 2011!

What do you think of my selections?
Who would you pick?

Cheers,
My Own Advisor

Rare earths are used for such applications as superconductors, magnets, electronic polishers, car batteries, luminescent materials, lasers, optical-fiber communication systems, welding, night vision goggles, rangefinders, and radar. The rare earth metals are:
Scandium
Yttrium
Lanthanum
Cerium
Praseodymium
Neodymium
Promethium
Samarium
Europium
Gadolinium
Terbium
Dysprosium
Holmium
Erbium
Thulium
Ytterbium
Lutetium
Other metals and elements are often (incorrectly) referred to as rare earth metals such as lithium and manganese. However, many of the companies involved in the mining of the rare earth metals are also involved in mining some of the other scarce elements.

Rare Element Resources is a Vancouver based company that explores for and develops mines in Canada and the United States, including the Bear Lodge property located in northeast Wyoming. This debt free company has 32 cents per share in cash, however the company reported a 6 cents per share loss for the quarter ended September 30.

Molycorp, Inc. (MCP) is another company involved in the rare earth industry, based in Greenwood Village, Colorado.The company has $5 million in debt, and over $351 million in cash, with $4.27 in cash per share. Latest earnings were a loss of 97 cents per share.

Another way to play this market is through the processors of rare earth metals, such as Neo Material Technologies, Inc. (NEM.TO) (NEMFF.PK), which trades on both the Pink Sheets and the Toronto Stock Exchange. This Toronto, Ontario based company processes rare earths, magnetic powders, and other metals. The company distributes cerium, lanthanum, europium, neodymium, dysprosium, yttrium, and other materials. The stock has a price to earnings ratio of 17.9 with a forward PE of 14. It also has an extremely favorable price earnings growth ratio of 0.31. Earnings for the latest quarter were up 53.4% on a 68.7% revenue increase.

A more conservative approach to rare earth investing is through the Market Vectors Rare Earths/Strategic Metals Exchange Traded Fund (REMX). This ETF has gone from 19.51 at the end of October to 25.63 now, a 31% increase in a couple months.

To see a free list of over 25 rare earth metals stocks, which can be downloaded, sorted, and updated, go to WallStreetNewsNetwork.com.

Disclosure: Author did not own any of the above at the time the article was written.

By Stockerblog.com

Most analysts say that pharmaceutical stocks and consumer staples are the best places to put your money during rising rates. But there is one stock that will benefit big time from higher interest that doesn’t fall into either of these sectors. The stock is Apple Inc. (AAPL).

Why Apple? First of all, it has no long-term debt. Second, the company has a huge amount of cash. No wonder why I referred to Apple as a money market fund a few months ago. Although many articles report that it has about $51 billion in cash, that number includes $25.391 billion in what Apple’s accountants consider long-term marketable securities. But Apple does have $11.261 billion in cash and cash equivalent securities plus $14.359 billion in short term marketable securities, for a total of $25.56 billion.

Apple’s weighted average interest rate has been dropping for the last three years, as have rates in general, from 3.44% in 2008, to 1.43% in 2009, to 0.75% for the current year. Of the $25.56 billion in what is essentially cash, total income based on the 0.75% weighted rate is about $191.7 million.

If the rate increased to 3% and assuming the balance remains the same (but it should certainly increase), interest income on effective cash would rise to $766.8 million, and at 5%, the income would be $1.278 billion, or $1.18 in additional earnings per share, currently at $15.15 per share. This additional interest is a pre-tax number, but based on the companys effective tax rate, additional earnings would still be close to a dollar a share.

Plus there are no other expenses incurred in generating this income. No salaries, no capital expenditures of manufacturing equipment, no purchase of raw materials, no office space rental, no nothing; just some electrons on a computer screen. Talk about easy money.

If you want to check out the lists of stocks which have a lot of cash, which can be downloaded, sorted, and updated, go to WallStreetNewsNetwork.com.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL.

By Stockerblog.com

This interview was originally published on December 17, 2010 at thekirkreport.com

Charles Kirk: It is with tremendous pleasure that I offer my last interview of 2010 with Mark Minervini.

As with many traders I interview, Mark requires no introduction as he is one of the most highly-respected independent traders of our generation. His blog in recent years has instantly become one of the must reads out there as he often shares market commentary and analysis which shows why the respect so many have for Mark is so well-deserved.

Moreover, his experience and past history of savvy market calls is legendary. It is with little doubt that we can all learn a lot from him! We hope you enjoy and find this focus interview helpful in your own journey toward more success in the markets.

Kirk: Hi, Mark. First of all, thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. I speak for many members who have a great deal of respect for you and we sincerely welcome you to this interview series.

Mark Minervini: You do a great job, Charles, and Im honored to be a part of it.

Kirk: Please tell us a little bit about how you got interested and started in trading.

Mark Minervini: I dropped out of school in the eighth grade in pursuit of a career as a drummer. From the money I made working as musician, I bought my first stock in 1983, which was a few hundred shares of Allis Chalmer. Shortly after, I read Richard Loves book, Superperformance Stocks: An Investment Strategy for the Individual Investor Based on the 4-Year Political Cycle. Everything Ive created with regard to my trading approach since stems from Loves initial impression on me, specifically from his writings in chapter 7.

Kirk: What was one of the most important lessons you learned early on?

Mark Minervini: That no one was going to do it for me; no one was going to make me rich except me. I learned that you must take responsibility for your results in the market and in life if you want to be exceptional. Secondly, I learned that in order to do well in the market you must be consistent; consistency is what separates the pro form the amateur. In order to have consistent success, risk must be managed in relation to potential reward as standard operating procedure. Youre not going to make just one trade, rather hundreds or even thousands of trades; its all about how much you make on average versus how much you lose on average over time. Lastly, I realized that I simply had to get to the bottom of what actually worked in the marketplace and ignore all the opinions and theories.

Kirk: Was there anyone out there who helped you greatly during your initial learning curve? If so, what did you learn most from them?

Mark Minervini: My Mother and my Father. I learned it was ok to do what I love; to go after my dream. I also learned it was ok to be unconventional. I was given the room to be creative. My parents trusted me. I always knew I was supported emotionally. Financially, we were poor but my parents supported my dreams.

Kirk: Indeed, it is so important to have a strong support structure in place. In a nutshell how do you currently approach the market and what is your primary trading strategy?

Mark Minervini: I approach the market from a risk first approach. My trading strategy is called Specific Entry Point Analysis or SEPA. We look to enter trades at low risk entry points relative to potential reward. Primary focus is not to lose money. Secondary focus is not to lose money. And, the final focus is to make more on average than I lose.

Kirk: You remind me of Buffett who said he had only two rules: 1) Never lose money and 2) see rule number 1! What do you see as the primary benefits from employing a strategy that focuses on both fundamentals and technicals?

Mark Minervini: The benefits are having all the pertinent information that is consistent with big winning stocks. We know what to look for both fundamentally and technically. I have seen stocks bought on pure technicals and the guy buying the stock doesnt even know that there was a cash offer or a proposed merger right at the price he paid. Refusing to look at fundamentals or any information that gives you an edge is usually because the individual just doesnt know how to use the info, or has some bias based on personal opinion or tradition.

Kirk: Why is this kind of trading best for you and, more importantly, why do you think it works so well?

Mark Minervini: My strategy works well because its my strategy. I know the strengths and, more importantly, the weaknesses of what it is I do. It also works well because I allow it to work and stick with it even when it runs into difficult times. Nothing works well if you keep changing your approach. To be a master you must be a specialist, not a jack of all trades.

Kirk: What do you trade mostly? Equities, options, futures, ETFs, currencies, etc.?

Mark Minervini: Only equities.

Kirk: In an average week how many trades do you make? What is your average hold time and how many positions do you have open at any given time?

Mark Minervini: During an average year I may make 400-500 trades. About half of that turnover is a result of taking small losses, which Im out of pretty quickly.

Kirk: What would you say are your primary strengths and weaknesses as a trader?

Mark Minervini: Discipline is my primary strength. And the willingness to admit when Im wrong and move on. My weakness is I usually sell early and often leave money on the table. But I dont really view that as a weakness, just something that could be improved upon. When you move in size you have to get out when the getting is good.

Kirk: In my experience it is often better to sell too early than too late Mark! How have you learned to mitigate your weaknesses and focus more on your strengths?

Mark Minervini: By not focusing too much on my strengths. If youre good at buying and bad at selling I would focus on selling; if you improve your selling you will have a complete game. Focus on making your weaknesses strengths and then you will have no weaknesses. Exploit your strengths and improve your weaknesses.

Kirk: What have been some of the most challenging lessons you have learned?

Mark Minervini: That you cant be everything. You must commit to a strategy and sacrifice other strategies. The problem with the market is its like playing poker however; you always get to see the next cards even though the hand is over. You always see what would have happened. This is very difficult to deal with for many people. To be successful, you have to understand that trading is NOT about picking highs and lows, its about making money.

Kirk: Very good. What are some of the key rules that you consider before selecting any potential trading opportunity?

Mark Minervini: How much am I risking is the very first concern. Also, does the stock meet all the necessary criteria? If the risk is acceptable and all the entry criteria are met, I enter the trade.

Kirk: What would you say is your average win: loss ratio for your trades?

Mark Minervini: I average 2 to 1.

Kirk: How has your overall performance been recently, as well as over the past few years?

Mark Minervini: Its been about the same as always. Im a consistent 2:1 trader.

Kirk: What would you say are your favorite kinds of technical and fundamental set-ups?

Mark Minervini: The ideal set-up is a stock emerging from a constructive consolidation with strong accelerating earnings and sales.

Kirk: Can you give us a recent example of a set-up you found to be very attractive and worked well in this market?

Mark Minervini: CML. Bought it on 11/24. Sold it on 12/7 for a quick profit.

Kirk: Have you noticed any trading set-ups more prone to failure than they have been in the past?

Mark Minervini: No. Not much has changed. Contrary to what many believe, its not different this time. LOL

Kirk: To help us understand your trading approach, can you talk about a recent successful trade from start to finish?

Mark Minervini: LULU. Supported by excellent fundamentals, the stock emerged from a double bottom pattern that formed from 4/15 11/04. I bought the stock on 11/05 the day the market topped just before a pullback of about 5% in the major averages. The stock was held through that market pullback because it acted normal and held above our stop. This gave me the conviction to add to the position as it emerged through its next buy point in November. I sold the stock (most likely too early) on 12/09 when they reported earnings up about +50% from the initial purchase from about a month earlier.

Kirk: Now please tell us about a recent unsuccessful trade.

Mark Minervini: Shorted GMCR; shorted the rally in October and November after the big break on SEC news. Stock rallied and stopped us out

Kirk: One of the things I most appreciate about you is how much you stress proper risk management. If we can, lets talk a little bit about position sizing. Can you provide an example of a recent trade and explain your method for determining the size relative to your own trading portfolio?

Mark Minervini: I want to own as much as I can but generally no more than 25% of my portfolio (as liquidity permits). You are not going to make huge returns being too diversified. However, I only risk what I can get out of safely based on liquidity.

Kirk: Thats interesting. I think many would be surprised at the idea of having any position anywhere near 25% of an entire portfolio. Besides over diversification and liquidity concerns, what common mistakes do you think many traders make concerning position sizing?

Mark Minervini: They dont know what an optimal position size should be based on their own risk/reward and risk tolerance. For instance, if youre a 2:1 trader, your optimal position size is 25%.

Kirk: Ok. I think I understand what you mean, but please explain this position sizing formula more in detail so others can perhaps apply it in their own trading. Can you offer another example?

Mark Minervini: Ok. First, its important to understand that you are not going to achieve huge returns consistently being overly diversified or by relying on diversification for protection. You will only get a smoothing effect. When you own a bunch of stocks you end up with two problems: the first being that you just cant watch and know all you need to know about each of them. The second problem is that you will have a difficult time getting fully invested quickly when opportunity presents itself and more importantly, getting liquid if you need to raise cash in a hurry. In addition, the math just doesnt support it. Depending on the size and risk tolerance of your portfolio you should typically have between 4 or 8 stocks and for large portfolios maybe up to as many as 10 or 12 stocks. This would provide sufficient diversification but not too much. The Optimal-f formula can act as a starting place for you to understand optimal position sizing based on expectation. If Ken Heebner of CGM Funds can move around billions of dollars in just twenty names and still manage to beat the market, then a personal portfolio can surely manage sufficiently with 4-5 or 10-12 stocks. If you lose 5-6% on average and even if your position size is at 25% exposure, youre still only be risking about 1.25% of your capital per trade. Of course, if you dont have an edge, then you will lose no matter what your position sizing is.

Kirk: Good, thats helpful. So, do you use and set stops, Mark? If so, whats your stop loss method?

Mark Minervini: I always know where Im going to get out of a trade before I get in. I aim to lose no more than 5-6% on average over time on my losers.

Kirk: Do you ever average down into a losing trade?

Mark Minervini: Theres a reason Paul Tudor Jones had a sign posted on his wall that read Losers average losers, and that reason is because its true. I almost always only add to a position if it proves itself and then I may add to my position at a higher price, not lower.

Kirk: Do you scale up and into winning positions? If so, how do you know when to increase a position size relative to your overall portfolio?

Mark Minervini: Yes. I generally move money into the better performing names at subsequent pivot points or set-ups.

Kirk: All good traders dedicate a lot of time and effort to improvement and reducing mistakes. How has your trading method evolved and improved over the years?

Mark Minervini: It just becomes more and more crystallized because I continue to focus on the same timeless principles, which allows me to become more and more of a specialist. The power of a narrow focus is amazing. The key is to be a real pro at something. Know all you can about a style or a tactic. Then you can build on that foundation. Traders give up too easily and jump around too much when things get difficult. How good do you think Kobe Bryant would be if while he was developing his skills growing up every time he had a really tough game he changed to a different sport or played a different position?

Kirk: I couldnt agree with you more Mark. I see this problem among many. Can you provide an example of something you thought was true when trading early in your career and now believe is just completely wrong?

Mark Minervini: Yeah, everything. But I learned very quickly sound principles. It just took me many years to master the application.

Kirk: Why do you think most traders fail?

Mark Minervini: Here are 6 reasons:

1. Poor selection criteria; usually based on personal opinion, theory or tips and bad advice
2. They dont stick to and commit to an approach; style drift
3. Dont cut losses (#1 mistake made by virtually all investors)
4. Dont know the truth about their trading they fail to conduct in-depth post analysis
5. Treat trading as a hobby not a business
6. Want too much too fast; learning a skill takes time

Kirk: Please describe a typical trading day for you. How do you organize and dedicate your time?

Mark Minervini: Most of my work is done the night before. I already know what Im going to trade before the open. I watch the market all day long, never leaving my desk for more than a few minutes during trading hours.

Kirk: How much time and attention do you pay to others opinions about the market and/or stocks you are trading?

Mark Minervini: Zero. I avoid outside opinions like the plague!

Kirk: Are there any tricks of the trade that you use to help maintain a consistent successful approach over a long period of time?

Mark Minervini: Yeah, long hours, hard work, a sound approach and discipline. There are no tricks or big secrets. Again, is there a secret to having a good basketball shot? It starts with a good coach, proper practice, plenty of hard work, discipline and sacrifice.

Kirk: Amen. However, most traders I know have a set of rules that they have learned from past mistakes. What are a few of yours that you think most traders would benefit from?

Mark Minervini: Hard work alone wont cut if you dont have a sound approach and if youre not doing the right things. You must be facing west if youre looking for a sun set. Approach each trade from risk first; ask how much can I lose. Dont risk more than you can expect to gain on average. Know the truth about your trading; study your results carefully. Never average down. Always cut your losses; keep your losses small. These are fundamental rules that should never be compromised.

Kirk: I suspect like all good traders you are working on improving your performance in some manner. Can you share what youre specifically working on right now?

Mark Minervini: Sticking to the rules. Always making sure we stick to the rules. We have a great approach, I dont like to get to tricky and over complicate something that requires a straight forward approach.

Kirk: Youve been trading for some time now. What would you say are the biggest changes in the markets and trading in general youve seen during your career, both good and bad?

Mark Minervini: The order handling rule change in 1997 has changed the way stocks move short-term because Market Makers dont really keep inventory anymore. Its a topic that would require a lengthy discussion; maybe we could talk about it another time. Other than that, not much has changed except more information moves faster than before.

Kirk: What advice would you give a person just now beginning to trade the markets?

Mark Minervini: Find a good mentor. Commit to a strategy. Cut your losses. Tune out the media. Take full responsibility for your results.
Kirk: What do you think are the greatest misconceptions beginning traders have about trading the markets and about trading systems?

Mark Minervini: Way too many to mention. Just about everything a beginner thinks is a misconception.

Kirk: A number of people who read my website desire to trade for a living and I receive a lot of questions concerning capital requirements needed to start and how to make the transition to trade full-time. Do you have any words of wisdom or rules of thumb to share along these lines?

Mark Minervini: I started with a very small sum of money and turned it into a fortune. Capital is not the challenge. Mastering yourself is the challenge. Discipline is the challenge. Persistence is the challenge.

Kirk: Do you think trading for a living is getting more difficult or easier for the average individual investor? Why?

Mark Minervini: Much easier. Tools for pros and amateurs are virtually identical. The pro has no edge. The individual has the advantage. No real liquidity concerns for the small trader versus the big fund manager. Its a fantastic time to be a stock trader!

Kirk: When all is said and done, in your experience, what is the best way to learn how to trade?

Mark Minervini: Trade. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said: Do the thing and you shall have the power. And then conduct post analysis. Learn to be objective. You could try and find a mentor. However, the chances of getting great advice are slim at best. Trading is just like any other profession, there are only a handful of really outstanding practitioners.

Kirk: Do you have any books, websites, etc. that you highly recommend beyond your own website?

Mark Minervini: The Kirk Report. Why is there anything else? LOL!!!

Kirk: You are too kind Mark. Although I know both of us share a love for the markets and trading, what are your long-term career plans and future for your website?

Mark Minervini: I honestly dont know for sure. My long-term plans are too stay healthy and be a good father to my daughter. This past year I started a pilot training program. Also, we now offer my research to the individual investor not just exclusively to the institution anymore. It feels good to help others achieve their goals. I think I may continue to develop that. Why hog all the good trades for myself? LOL!

Kirk: What are some of your personal passions beyond the market?

Mark Minervini: Ive been a drummer since I was 6 years old and I continue to play. I play tennis, train boxing and lift weights to stay in shape, and I play an occasional round of golf.

Kirk: Finally, if you had only one piece of advice to share with all traders, what would it be?

Mark Minervini: Believe in yourself and never give up. Persistence is more important than knowledge. Make an unconditional commitment to trading and you will not fail.

Kirk: Thank you so much Mark. I really enjoyed this interview and Im sure others will find it helpful.

Before I acknowledge all the great articles Ive read over the last week or so, I want wish my readers a very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!



2010 was a great year for my wife and I and we have lots to be thankful for. I guess like many folks at this time of year, I find myself being very reflective, which is a good thing in my opinion. Over the last 12 months, I started this blog, met some respected bloggers in the Ottawa area like Canadian Capitalist, Big Cajun Man, Michael James and Larry MacDonald, got married and had an amazing honeymoon, travelled to foreign countries, saw my sister-in-law beat cancer, bought and moved into a new house and watched some of our close friends start families with happy, healthy children. It has been a very rewarding year.

My guess is as good as yours what will happen in 2011 but I must say Im looking forward to what that might be


Over the next couple of weeks, chances are youll see some random posts. I do hope to post Part 2 of my interview with Derek Foster before the calendar turns to January but other than that, no promises. Im going to take some time to unwind, settle into the new place, catch up with family and friends and simply enjoy the holidays.  The red wine is calling now…


Whatever your plans are this holiday season, I hope they keep you safe, happy and healthy. I look forward to sharing more of my financial independence journey with you in 2011.  I think it’s going to be a great year!

Merry Christmas!
Mark

Here are just a few of the excellent articles I read this week.

One way to define cloud computing is having your programs and data stored remotely on a server far away, instead of on individual computers. As long as you have an Internet connection, you can have a fairly dumb computer ans still utilize cloud computing. The clouds are simply the servers of companies that provide this service, and those servers can be located anywhere in the world. If you have Yahoo (YHOO) mail, Google (GOOG) gmail, or hotmail, then you are using cloud computing in a small way. You don’t have the email servers in your office or home, you use the Yahoo or Google servers. Many colleges and universities are turning over their student email services to Google, which saves them money on servers and saves on staffing for support.

These same benefits apply to the private sector, especially when you extend it to data storage and computer software. You don’t need a technician to come out and install new software to each employees’ station. You don’t need a bunch of network administrators monitoring the company’s servers. You don’t need to periodically upgrade computers. You don’t need to own a bunch of servers. You cut down on the costs and issues relating to the disposal of old computers and servers. You don’t need to deal with data security, as that is the job of the cloud computing company. The benefits of clouds are extensive, and there are over 25 stocks in the cloud industry to choose from, according to the Cloud Computer Stock list at WallStreetNewsNetwork.com, including companies involved in server farms and outsourced storage systems.

Cloud computing as a growing industry now appears almost every day in the financial press. And the interest from investors has been significant. Take for example Salesforce.com (CRM), which is up over 600% since it started trading in 2004.

Salesforce.com is a provider of customer-relationship management services that has promoted ‘the end of software’. Salesforce has customers of all sizes, including Corporate Express division of Staples (SPLS), Daiwa Securities (DSECY.PK), Expedia (EXPE), Dow Jones Newswires subsidiary of News Corp. (NWS-A), SunTrust Banks (STI), and Kaiser Permanente. Salesforce trades at a lofty 89 times forward earnings, debt in the amount of $495 million, with over $769 million in cash. The company just reported a quarterly sales increase of 29.8% year over year, with a 1.8% increase in earnings.

VMware (VMW) is another major cloud and virtualization player. Its product VMware vSphere is a cloud computing data center platform. It sports a forward PE ratio of 49.6. The company has $450 million in debt with $2.9 billion in cash. The company reported that latest earnings increased an incredible 121.4% in earnings on a 45.8% increase in revenues.

Citrix Systems, Inc. (CTXS) provides on demand applications and online services, including GoToMeeting, GoToWebinar, GoToTraining, GoToAssist, and GoToMyPC. This debt free company has $902 million in cash and carries a forward PE of 30. The latest quarterly earnings were up 64.3% on a revenue increase of 17.8%.

To access a free Excel spreadsheet database of numerous companies involved in cloud computing in some way, that can be downloaded, sorted, and updated, go to wsnn.com. You can also get info on the green aspects of cloud computing from my book The Green Light on Green Stocks: A Quick Guide to Green Investing and Making Money in Alternative Energy Stocks, in which I described cloud computing as a green industry and a way of providing money saving services to many corporations.

Disclosure: Author owns YHOO.

By Stockerblog.com